What I Talk About When I Talk About Opera – My Top-5 Chart of Opera Moments

December 18, 2007 at 5:26 pm | In Fandom, Music, Opera, Reviews, Theatre, Top 5/Top 10, youtube | 6 Comments

Last night I took The Boyfriend to the Opera for the first time, to see Don Carlos. The Boyfriend is not an operafan, he had only ever seen one opera prior to the one last night, and it hadn’t been much of a success. So I was of course a tad nervous about what he’d think of his second go at the genre, and maybe that’s why I found myself talking non-stop during the break about why the King Philip’s aria in the third act is the best operatic music ever written, what other scenes in other operas were my favourites, and why, in general, opera is a great, great art form, complete with my arms flailing wildly and me mimicking like a crazy person, eager to get the message through.

After the fact I realized, of course, that I could have spared myself a lot of that flailing and mimicking, had I only waited to give him this lengthy lecture ’till we were in the vicinity of a computer. Because, seriously, after youtube.com has been invented there is really no need for trying to describe anyone anything any more: You just click on that youtube icon on your Favourites link, do a search, and show them what the hell you’re talking about. It’s all there.

And so, I’ve decided to do a top-5 chart of my favourite opera moments, here on this blog, so that I may show my boyfriend, and anyone else interested, exactly what the hell I’m talking about when I talk about opera. Each opera moment will be illustrated with the courtesy of youtube, and described by me.

5. “Deh vieni, non tardar” – Le Nozze di Figaro

This aria from the fourth act of The Marriage of Figaro is lovely. There is no other word for it. Seductive, smooth and flexible, the sound of it flows like a cool breeze through a garden on a warm summer night. 

After her marriage to her beloved Figaro, a valet, chamber maid Susanna has snuck into the castle’s garden where she’s conspiring with her lady, the Countess, to play a trick on The Count, who’s been neglecting his loving wife and pursuing Susanna, who wants nothing to do with him. However, as Susanna realizes that Figaro is in the garden, too, furiously and wrongly believing Susanna to be about to, well, ”perform her feudal duties” with their master, Susanna decides to get back at her jealous spouse by showing herself from her most seductive side, thus enraging him further.

And well she succeeds! To me, Susanna is easily the sexiest among operatic heroines, with her shrewd mind, tough will, witty tongue and attractive appearance, and all of these virtues shine through in this aria, where she lets her soprano slides like sweet caresses from one note to the other, all the while never loosing sight of the tricks she’s playing on the two men in her life; the Count and Figaro. The woodwinds in the orchestration are deliciously ambiguous, harking both of the enchanting scene that Susanna is describing in her aria (murmering streams, laughing flowers and fresh turf), and of Susanna’s surpressed giggles at her own scheme. 

I’m not crazy about Susanna’s heavy-looking costume in the above clip, but the scenery and the dark-blue light are very nice!

4. “Tutte le feste al tempio” – Rigoletto

If I were to make up the most humiliating and morfifying scenario possible, I think it would be having to live through a very unpleasant sexual encounter, only to be faced immediately afterwards with my father, who, as I would learn only in that same instant, was actually a court jester, complete with a hat with little bells on it.

These, exactly, are the circumstances in this very moving scene from Verdi’s Rigoletto. Gilda, who’s been overly protected by her father to the point where she hasn’t even known what his name was or what he did for a living, has just learned about the birds and the bee the hard way: She has been abducted to the castle of the Duke of Mantova, and the Duke (whom she believed to be a poor student who was madly in love with her) has date-raped her, and when she finally escapes she finds her father there, - dressed up ridiculously in a court jester’s outfit! And he’s asking her to tell her what just happened to her! “Heaven, lend me courage!” exclaims Gilda before starting her recount of her sufferings, and one certainly can’t blame her.

The recount she delievers is the mournful, minor-key aria found in the first 3:40 minutes of the above youtube file, and I think it’s incredibly beautiful. It contains all the fragility, uncertainty, immense joy, and terrible sadness of the Gilda character, who’s the epitome of all the naive-and-abused, young women this world has ever held.

The remaining four minutes of the youtubed video show Rigoletto’s desperation upon learning of his daughter’s dishonour, and subsequently his very moving attempt at comforting her sorrow.  I like both Andrea Rost’s and Paolo Gavanelli’s performance in this seemingly very traditional staging of the opera. (Even if I think that Gilda’s nightgown could have been a little more risqué than it is. She’s very demure-looking for a recent date-rape victim).

3. The Final scene of Eugene Onegin

Eugene Onegin is a relatively new aquaintance to me.

I first saw the opera last Spring in a Copenhagen cinema, where the staging of the above clip was shown on the big screen. I was there with an opera-loving friend, and neither of us were prepared for the impact the opera had on us. After the first act, we were both very much affected by the rejection that Tatiana lived through, and ended up spending the entire break relating to her pain and discussing painful rejections that we had lived through ourselves. And, familiar the storyline of Eugene Onegin, we were both looking forward to the final scene, where Eugene Onegin re-enters an older, married Tatiana’s life, only to be rejected by her, even though she still loves him. “That ought to show that haughty jerk!”, we agreed, anticipating sweet, by-proxy revenge over the men who had hurt us ”Then he’ll regret his own arrogance!”

But then, when we did reach the final act, what we found was that there was no victory in her rejection – at all. Tatiana was miserable and not triumphant in the least, when she rejected Eugene Onegin. And contemplating their desperate last duet with each other, we fully forgave him, too. Because revenge isn’t sweet at all, and no triumphant haughtiness could ever make up for the pain of lost love. Which is a beautiful message, but a heart-wrenching one, too. My friend and I were both moved to tears and were visibly trembling when the lights in the theatre went up again after Eugene’s “O, lamentable fate!” and the opera’s dramatic final cords. She and I had to take a long walk afterwards to steady ourselves, we were that shaken. I’ll never forget that day.

I think the above staging, with Renée Fleming and Dmitri Hvorostovsky is absolutely brilliant, and I can’t imagine it being done better than this. The scenography and the costumes are simple, but bear impact, Renée Fleming is wonderfully sweet in the part of bold daydreamer Tatiana, Hvorostovsky is every bit as haughty as he should be, and the two of them have magnificient chemistry. Bravi! Also, *sob*.

2. “La povera mia cena fu interrotta” – Tosca

I love that thing they often do in operas, where they pretend to do be casually chit-chatting, all the while they’re totally hating each other or scheming against each other. Eboli and Rodrigo do it in Don Carlos, too, Ieronimus and Leonard do it in Masquerade, and Iago and Cassio do it in Otello.

No one, however does it better or more interestingly than Tosca and Scarpia in Tosca, I think. “My humble dinner was interrupted” says Scarpia, which is just such a wonderful euphemism for what just happened -  Scarpia has violently interrogated Tosca’s political rebel boyfriend right in front of her, and, upon his continuous denials, has had his guards dragging him off to be executed! Dramatic Floria Tosca is not a good actress in real life, so of course she can only keep up the chit-chat for so long before she once again interrupts Scarpia’s dinner. “How much [money do you want]!”, she snaps at Scarpia, in the hopes of buying Mario, her boyfriend, free. Ah, but Scarpia doesn’t want her money, he says, he wants something else – namely her; her body. Scarpia is still terrifyingly matter-of-fact when he proposes this gruesome negotiation, but it doesn’t last: Soon his desire for Tosca shines through his slick conversational skills, and he throws himself at Tosca, with a druggingly passionate claim, leaving Tosca to understand that more than negotiating with cold, corrupted chief of police, she’s dealing with a sadistic maniac: “Already in the past I burned with passion for the diva. But the way you’ve been tonight, I have never seen you before. Your tears were lava to my senses, and that fierce hatred that your eyes shot at me only fanned the fire in my blood.”

In other words, the more she hates him, the more she rejects and fights him, the more he wants to get it on with her. Ick! The most claustrophobic moment is reached when Tosca, desperate to escape Scarpia and his devilish suggestion, cries: “I hate you, vile person!”. “All the same to me,” groans Scarpia, ”- spasms of anger, or spasms of passion…!” The scene ends with the eerie sound of the scaffold drums beating for Mario outside the window that Tosca vainly threatens to jump out of, as Scarpia advices Tosca to think over his proposition veeeery carefully…

It doesn’t get much better than this, drama-wise, I think. Tosca is desperate, and Scarpia is so scary, yet grotesquely alluring in his raging passion. The subsequent scene with Tosca’s aria “Vissi d’arte” is very popular, but I’m actually not too fond of it. To me it halts the action in an otherwise perfectly composed, action-packed second act, and brings too much attention to Tosca, whose diva-like psychology I regard as insignificant to the story. To me, Tosca is the story depicting the movements of a society where a conservative reign is giving way under the pressure of a rapidly growing rebellion, and as such, the diva Floria Tosca only represents the goods that each party hope to gain; love, beauty, art, popularity. Floria Tosca is Mario the rebel’s boyfriend because the times they are a-changing in Rome, and the rebels are starting to win. And when the old, losing regime, represented by Scarpia, realizes this, they do what an oppressive regime always does when threatened: They use violence to get what they want. It’s this political movement that we see in the second act of Tosca, brilliantly depicted through the struggle of a woman against the sick passions of a sadistic man.

The staging shown in this clip, featuring Maria Callas and Tito Gobbi, is from a very popular recorded staging of Tosca, but I have to say that I’m not all that crazy about it. I prefer the 2002 Jacquot Tosca movie, in which Ruggero Raimondi shines enough in the part of Scarpia to make up for the fact that Angela Georghiu and Roberto Alagna are totally hamming it up. (I do like the way Gobbi grabs his man-boobs upon singing about Tosca’s tears being like lava to his senses, though! :D )

1. “Ella giammai m’amo” – Don Carlos

This is my bring-to-a-desert-island aria. As I explained to The Boyfriend, arm-flailingly, last night; this aria simply contains all human misery. All the misery of humankind, worked into one, amazing aria. Aging King Philip, realizing that his wife doesn’t love him, finds himself old and unloved, and destined for a lonely death, a death that will offer him the only peace he will ever be able to find. Accordingly the music of the aria moves from anguish at his broken heart, over a lento march of sorrow at the thought of his own royal funeral, and on to an agitato wish to rise above his human form and be a God, who might look into the heart of his wife, of Elisabetta, the heart that will always be closed to him. It doesn’t get any more moving than this, I think. Verdi’s music is brilliant, and I love the lyric’s subtle use of the colour of white as something threatening: The youthful, pale light of dawn that awakens Philip from his reveries, his own white hair that Elisabetta contemplated sadly when she received him as her husband. Absolutely perfect.

I like the staging of the youtubed video, although I think it’s a shame that the editor has left out the first few bars of the prelude to the aria – this is one of those arias where the anticipation of the prelude forms a complete symbiosis with the release of sentiment that the aria delievers. I love the EMI recording of the opera with Ruggero Raimondi sining Philip: Raimondi beautifully climaxes with a powerful forte at the final, desperate outcry “Amor per me non ha!”.

/marie

Halloween Posting – “Vous Qui Faites l’Endormie”

October 31, 2007 at 10:58 am | In Internet Findings, Music, Opera, The Course of the Year, Theatre, youtube | 2 Comments

Edited because I posted the same video twice… 

I am really sorry that I’ve been so inactive here at the blog lately. Things have been busy ’s all. I don’t have time for much posting right now either, but seeing as tonight is Halloween, I thought I’d just pop in and post something appropriately spooky.

The spooky item in question is the aria “Vous qui faites l’endormie” from Gounod’s Faust, an aria I’ve always been very fond of.

The aria is sung by Mephisto, but what I particularly like about it is that it’s not a through-and-through testimony of evil and darkness like Iago’s credo in Otello (the music of which I always loved, but which I always had issues with, lyrics-wise, but that’s another story). Rather, Mephisto’s aria is a truly devilish mix of seduction and horror. Because the aria actually presents three different viewpoints: (1) a serenader’s, addressing a young woman and appealing to her to resist her lanquishing lover, (2) a narrator, coolly recounting the course of the events, (3) and a third person warning the addressed girl to resist the young man:

“You who are supposed to be asleep
Don’t you hear,
O, Catherine, my sweetheart,
Don’t you hear my voice and the patter of my feet?”
Thus your lover calls you
And your heart believes him. Hahaha!
Don’t open your door, my beauty,
until that ring is on your finger.”
 

The second stanza follows the same structure:

“Catherine, whom I adore,
why would you refuse
from your love who begs you
why refuse such a sweet kiss?”
Thus pleads your lover
and your hearts believes him. Ha ha ha!
Don’t give a kiss, my sweetheart,
till that ring is on your finger

It’s this neutrality, achieved through the polysonic nature of the aria, that’s so scary, I think. To use a modern term for it; it seems psycopathic, the way the narrator is able to step in and out of characters like that. And of course given the context of the aria, as well as Mephisto’s laugh, it all serves as a cruel mockery of character Marguerite: At this point in the opera, Marguerite has already opened her door (in every possible Freudian or literal definition of the term) to her lover; she has not waited for the ring on her finger, and she has become pregnant with her lover’s baby and is now in a desperate situation.

I rather like the version of the aria linked to in this post. It’s Ferrucio Furlanetto singing Mephisto, and I like the aesthetic effect of the gloomily lit hall, and the symbolic value of Mephiso being dressed as the perfect stunt-double for Faust.

Another, even more interesting-looking version is this one:

Sublime Bryn Terfel (who is, in my opinion, the definition of a larger-than-life stage personality) is a much more stoic and solemn Mephisto than any Mephisto I’ve ever seen, and it works very well in contrast to the fumbling, overdosing Faust (Roberto Alagna) in the background. 

Make sure to catch the last thirty seconds of the clip – there’s some delicious HoYay! going on between Mephisto and Faust, complete with Terfel fondling Alagna, which is a scenario I never, ever could have enviosioned. :)

Happy Halloween!

/marie

Replay: Veronika by Xofia

July 15, 2007 at 12:54 pm | In Art, Reviews, Theatre | Leave a Comment

Copenhagen is not compltely lost when it comes to underground theatre, so proves theatre group Xofia’s latest staging REPLAY Veronika. I attended the performance in May and was very impressed with this thougtprovoking and inspired staging.

REPLAY Veronika 

The play was inspired by Kurt Vonnegut’s Timequake, the idea that a lapse in time could occur, setting history for a period of time, and thus suspending man’s free will momentarily. In REPLAY Veronika such a phenomenon occurs, resulting in the repetition of eight years (1999-2007), and main character Veronika is the only one in the world who preserves her free will and thus her ability to change her fate as of November 14 2007, the date that marks the occurence of the timequake.

The play queries the idea of a free will as Veronika, even when given the opportunity to change a less than desirable destiny, chooses to a large degree to follow the road already taken, and it does so in a fresh and sympathetically unresolved manner, leaving the ending open and inviting the audience to make a guess as to what will follow. It’s a kind of like a modern Everyman play, one might say, drawing on latter-day mythology in lieu of the lorn Christianity-inspired gallery of characters of medieval mystery plays. Veronika (Birgit Ulla Uldall-Ekman) with her mirroring surarium-name is Everywoman and the object of identification, God-like character Time (Sara Damgaard Andersen) embodies the much-worshipped media holding the remote control to a flat-screen monitor and effectively rewinds and fast-forwards, Lev (Bjørn Vikkelsø) is Veronika’s road-not-taken personified as the passionate, distant man in her life, contrasted by earthbound, button-down-shirted husband Jakob (Asger Kjær Pedersen),  and clingy girlfriend Lily (Stina Mølgaard Pedersen), while The Stranger (Ulf Rathjen Kring Hansen) is an anon.-angelic kind of helper, dressed very appropriately like a film-noir informant in a hat and cottoncoat. It’s hard not to identify with Veronika as the years flash by in the course of about 80 minutes, relating to her story as well as (re-)considering one’s own actions and choices of the 1999-2007 time-span.

The art direction is very effective; the stage settings show the inside of an apartment, ambiguously decorated so that it reflects both claustrophic conformity and wall-paper-tattering rebellion, and I especially love the aforementioned flat-screen monitor: The rewinding and fast-forwarding is a brilliantly tangible way of presenting the passing of time, and I have always been a total sucker for the use of multi-media in modern theatre. I think it’s such a great Michel-Foucault-”Des espaces autres” way of depicting the juxtaposition of spaces, and such a juxtaposition is naturally relevant in a performance on the subject of life choices and dimensional displacement.

Finally, it was great to see a theatre make such great use of the programmes for their productions! Xofia’s visual designer Søren Meisner (also in charge of the absolutely awesome web design at xofia.dk) has done a magnificent job with the layout, and his poster (the above picture) is a rare example of promotional art offering an interpretation of and thus interacting with the stage performance.

/marie

Giulio Cesare in Copenhagen

July 15, 2007 at 9:54 am | In Music, Opera, Reviews, Theatre | 2 Comments

One of my favourite opera productions ever is Francisco Negrin’s staging of Giulio Cesare in Egitto, which played at the Royal Theatre of Copenhagen in 2002 and 2005, and should, from what I understand, be released on DVD soonish for the world to enjoy I attended the re-opening on March 7 2005 and wrote an exstatic review afterwards: 

Cesare

I need to shout with joy! Squee!
Giulio Cesare at the Royal Theatre last night was fantastic. Really, it’s just about the best performance I’ve ever seen. All the time I had this feeling that the opera couldn’t possibly have been better directed, nor could the music have been played better or the parts been better sung. Quite outstanding. 

Andreas Scholl… *swoon*… I am lost for words and have to contribute to the general Hans Christian Andersen-nausea and quote the grand old writer: “The Lord bless you here on earth, you are an angel from his Kingdom.” Scholl’s incredible! He has such a beautiful voice and then he makes such good use of it. Talk about controlling and taming Nature! In the cool way that doesn’t involve an unpleasant operation. And then it’s just nice to see a really tall, broad man on stage, who looks like he knows what he’s doing and seems well-balanced. It was great that he was able to drool overtly over Cleopatra, without losing the least bit of his authority in the process. That’s the way to go, men of the world! He was convincing as a ruler of nations as well as the heart of Cleopatra the Über-woman.

This naturally leads me to the subject of Inger Dam-Jensen (Cleopatra). Oh, how I love her voice. And how well she acts! She was thoroughly gorgeous as the sexy, seductive Cleopatra, and she emphasized the fact that Cleopatra went through a personal development in the course of the story – from the rather silly girl we met at the beginning of the opera, who couldn’t really figure out how to hold her sceptre and who teased her brother, into the serene woman who was standing erect and dignified by Giulio Cesare’s side in the last scene. To me, one of the most moving scenes of the performance was the scene with the (insanely beautiful) “Se pieta di me non senti” when she picked up Cesare’s jacket from the floor, held it tight, and then tossed it across tge floor in despair. One really felt how the entire world had been changed in one moment for Cleopatra, and it was almost anger she felt as she tossed Giulio’s metonymical jacket – the wonderful and angry realization that she loved Giulio and that thus she had become vulnerable; possibly for the first time in her life.

Again: I don’t think there was one single weak link in the performance. Beautiful, noble Randi Stene (Cornelia) was, both with her acting and her voice a constant centre of the dolorously serious aspect of the opera, and as her son Sextus Tuva Semmingson carried conviction the same way as Elisabeth Jansson did as Cherubino in The Marriage of Figaro last season (although, naturally, with more severity). And I will never stop admiring her voice which Michael Bo from newspaper Politiken with a very apposite term usually defines as “velvet-like”.
Christopher Robson was a wonderfully disgusting villain in the part of Tolomeo, and Palle Knudsen was really touching as the clumsy Achilla who just wanted to kiss and hug Cornelia but who was about to squeeze her to death instead. I am full of admiration for Michael Maniaci (Nireno) – he could really move about on stage! He seemed nicely mysterious, and I loved it that he was a kind of genie who provoked the progress of the story, rather than just a servant. And I just really, really like John Lundgren with his harmonious, full baritone, and I enjoyed his Curio, a part he acted out well, too. A competent military man, it would seem, but he managed to show us more sides of Curio: I was moved when he tried to comfort the distraught Cornelia (I am totally going to write a fan-fic in which Curio and Cornelia hook up!), and it was great fun to see him standing about, obvioulsy on the verge of dropping his beret in admiration of Cleopatra’s cleavage.

The duet between Andreas Scholl and the 1st violinist was definitely a musical highlight of the evening – incredibly beautiful – but I have to admit that this was the one part of the directing that I didn’t like. Meta-directing does work sometimes – I loved it when the contrastingly blue curtain emerged behind the dark red and presented a performance within the performance which was “only for pleasure” (the motto of The Royal Theatre is “Not only for pleasure”) – but I don’t think it went very well with the staging that they had pulled up a musician from the orchestra pit and had her interacting with one of the otherwise perfectly rounded characters on stage. Well, I guess I do have a little too much of a grudge against meta-art, but I think that it often – possibly unwittingly – may send the message that one shouldn’t take the characters on stage all that seriously anyway. … ‘Is it really necessary to point so much to one self as a media?’ I wonder. I mean, we’ve all bought our tickets and placed ourselves in the plush seats – we are well aware of the fact that we have stepped out of Reality and into a realm of illusion. Would be nice to be allowed to just stay there.

…But I’m getting nitpicky here, and I really did love the directing with its neat mix of lightness and gravity which was so wonderfully underlined by genius conductor/cembalist Lars Ulrik Mortensen and the ConcertoCopenhagen orchestra.

Hurrah for Giulio! Thanks to everyone involved for a celestial experience.

/marie

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.